Midden Oosten

Van elders

De Iraanse dreiging

door Noam Chomsky Z Magazine juli 2010

In brede kring wordt de dreiging door Iran gezien als de meest serieuze crisis in de buitenlandpolitiek van de regering Obama.

Generaal Petraeus informeerde in maart 2010 de Senaatscommissie voor de Strijdkrachten dat “het Iraanse regiem de voornaamste bedreiging voor de stabiliteit op staatsniveau vormt” in het gebied dat onder de verantwoordelijkheid van het Amerikaanse Centrale Commando in het Midden-Oosten en Centraal-Azië valt. Dit is de belangrijkste regio voor de Amerikaanse mondiale betrokkenheid. De term ‘stabiliteit’ wordt hier gebruikt in haar technische betekenis: stevig onder Amerikaanse controle. In juni 2010 heeft het Amerikaanse Congres nieuwe sancties tegen Iran goedgekeurd. Deze sancties bevatten nog hogere boetes voor buitenlandse bedrijven die met Iran handel drijven.


Not by cement alone

Amira Hass, Haaretz

The flotilla, like its predecessors and the ones still to come, serves the Israeli goal, which is to complete the process of separating the Gaza Strip from the West Bank. The achievement of the failed flotilla to Gaza - mainly, it must be conceded, by its dead - is that the demand is being heard from everywhere that Israel halt its policy of siege.


The Revolution is Aging: Iran Faces Itself

As’ad Abu Khalil The angry Arab First published in Arabic: Al Akhbar
 
It has been amusing to follow events in Iran, both on Arab and western media outlets. Saudi media has been fit for listing under comedy classification: you see the anchor (who is usually Lebanese – what’s the story behind Lebanese loyalty to the House of Saud’s oil? Is it a matter of principle or is it the one-day Arabhood that Antioch’s patriarch described?) screaming in face of the Iranian guest or his delegate: and why doesn’t Iran repeat the elections under free and fair regulations? The House of Saud insists on free and fair elections, but only in Iran.

"Amos Oz: Arab Liberal Love for Israel."

As'ad Abu Khalil, The angry Arab

They want to make of Amos Oz a friend of the Arabs, by force. They want to crown him a king of peace. Those who included a secret clause about normalization with Israel in the Thomas Friedman-Abdullah initiative, they rush to try and vainly influence the political culture of the Arab world. Al-Saud liberal princes enthusiastically promote Amos Oz and his counterparts. They believe him to be a symbol of the “Israeli peace” camp. They try to convince the Arab people of the rightness of Zionism in their midst. That is their desire.

Hezbollah's New Political Platform

By Fawwaz Traboulsi from Zmag

The following article by Fawwaz Traboulsi appeared in the Beirut daily as-Safir of December 2, 2009.
Traboulsi's article is an assessment and left critique of the main themes in Hezbollah's new political platform. The platform was released on November 30 at the conclusion of a general congress that had met intermittently over several months. It was published partially or entirely in several Arabic-language media outlets, inside and outside Lebanon, in early December 2009. The platform now becomes Hezbollah's political manifesto in place of its founding document, its so-called 1985 Open Letter.


Iran

Door: Juan Cole, Informed Comment Thursday, January 07, 2010

 
In the past three weeks, Iran observers have been baffled by the range of opinion appearing on the op-ed page of The New York Times concerning Iran, and the uneven reporting on that country. Before the holidays, Alan Kuperman, a political scientist at the University of Texas Austin, called for bombing Iran-- becoming the first respectable academic in the US to take a position usually associated with discredited angry Neoconservatives such as John Bolton. Kuperman's argument is wrong in almost every particular, and that the NYT editors published it was considered alarming by many Iranists. We all remember how the newspaper printed a long series of bald-faced lies and easily disproved fantasies about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq in 2002, which certainly helped legitimate and pave the way for war on that country. We worried that the fix was in against Iran.


Israeli Jews and the one-state solution

Door: Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 10 November 2009
Anyone who rejects the two-state solution, won't bring a one-state solution. They will instead bring one war, not one state. A bloody war with no end. -- Israeli President Shimon Peres, 7 November 2009.

One of the most commonly voiced objections to a one-state solution for Palestine/Israel stems from the accurate observation that the vast majority of Israeli Jews reject it, and fear being "swamped" by a Palestinian majority. Across the political spectrum, Israeli Jews insist on maintaining a separate Jewish-majority state.


De Israel-connectie van Geert Wilders

Door:Harm Ede Botje / Freke Vuijst uit de VN 15 oktober 2009

Geert Wilders’ ‘Fitna’ blijkt gebaseerd op de twee jaar eerder uitgebrachte film ‘Obsession’. Wie zijn de makers van die Israëlische film?

Geert Wilders is een grote vriend van Israël. Als middelbare scholier trok hij naar het beloofde land om te werken in een moshav, een collectieve boerderij op de bezette Westelijke Jordaanoever.

Onlangs doken van die tijd foto’s op die in Vrij Nederland werden gepubliceerd. Naar eigen zeggen is Wilders sindsdien tientallen keren in Israël geweest. Tijdens zijn VVD-jaren kwam hij al steevast op voor de belangen van Israël, wees hij voortdurend op de gevaren van Iran dat met zijn lange-afstandsraketten Israël van de kaart zou kunnen vegen. Maar hij was ook een voorstander van het vredesproces met de Palestijnen.


The coming intifada

By: Yousef Munayyer
This article is republished from the website of The Palestine Center.

Anyone watching the Middle East and the Occupied Palestinian Territories recently can tell you that anger and rage is bubbling just below the surface. What may not seem apparent is that a new intifada, or uprising, may be right around the corner.


Inhoud syndiceren